Shape of Braces - Is conical cross-section the best shape?

Talk about musical instrument construction, setup and repair.

Moderators: kiwigeo, Jeremy D

Post Reply
Simon126
Gidgee
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2022 12:45 am

Shape of Braces - Is conical cross-section the best shape?

Post by Simon126 » Fri Feb 03, 2023 6:37 am

I am building a dreadnought with traditional x-bracing. I want to explore newer construction techniques for this build. I understand why braces are traditionally thinned so them have conical cross-sections. They are fat at the bottom and taper to a point at the top. The traditional explanation is that height of the brace is important and thinning the sides reduces the weight while preserving strength.

But if a brace is a beam underneath the soundboard, wouldn't an I-Shape cross-section be better? It would still be low weight but provide more strength. Does anyone have any experience with changing the shape of bracing to an I-Shape cross section?

Dave M
Blackwood
Posts: 595
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 6:44 am
Location: Somerset UK

Re: Shape of Braces - Is conical cross-section the best shape?

Post by Dave M » Sat Feb 04, 2023 3:28 am

In principal you are correct that an I beam shape should be useful. However when you look at the dimensions in practice it is simply not practical to make in timber.

There is a clear exposition of brace shapes in the Gore/Gilet design book section 4.4.7 if you can scrounge a look at it. The end result is essentially that a tall triangular brace gives you most bang for your buck in terms stiffness against mass. Within limits, too narrow a base will be difficult to glue securely.

Cheers Dave
------------------
Dave

User avatar
peter.coombe
Blackwood
Posts: 723
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:52 pm
Location: Bega, NSW
Contact:

Re: Shape of Braces - Is conical cross-section the best shape?

Post by peter.coombe » Sat Feb 04, 2023 11:18 am

The only really practical way to make an I beam brace is to use carbon fibre tow on the top and bottom of the brace. That is how falcate bracing is implemented and is very well covered in the Gore/Gilet books. As you say it does make braces that a lighter in weight for the same stiffness. If have not read the books then you need to get a copy and read them.
Peter Coombe - mandolin, mandola and guitar maker
http://www.petercoombe.com

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10582
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Shape of Braces - Is conical cross-section the best shape?

Post by kiwigeo » Sat Feb 04, 2023 11:33 am

Dave M wrote:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 3:28 am
The end result is essentially that a tall triangular brace gives you most bang for your buck in terms stiffness against mass.
And changing height of brace is a quicker way of adjusting stiffness than taking meat off the sides.
Martin

TomBeltran
Gidgee
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue May 29, 2018 1:58 am

Re: Shape of Braces - Is conical cross-section the best shape?

Post by TomBeltran » Tue Feb 07, 2023 3:09 am

Dave M wrote:
Sat Feb 04, 2023 3:28 am
In principal you are correct that an I beam shape should be useful. However when you look at the dimensions in practice it is simply not practical to make in timber.
Stuart Mossman, in the later 1970's used an I-Beam construction in his steel string guitars that was very well regarded. You might be able to find details and a picture on the web.

Also, John Gilbert's classical guitars had fan braces in a "T" shape, which is sort of a one-half I-Beam. David Schramm has an article with pictures of the brace.

Dave M
Blackwood
Posts: 595
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 6:44 am
Location: Somerset UK

Re: Shape of Braces - Is conical cross-section the best shape?

Post by Dave M » Wed Feb 08, 2023 3:43 am

Thanks Tom That's interesting.

That fan bracing by Gilbert does however look pretty big compared say to a typical Torres. It would certainly improve the gluing area of the brace.
------------------
Dave

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10582
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Shape of Braces - Is conical cross-section the best shape?

Post by kiwigeo » Wed Feb 08, 2023 8:44 am

One makers take on I beam braces.......comments anyone?
tumblr_lqg6ludN4a1qkrsrz.jpg
tumblr_lqg6ludN4a1qkrsrz.jpg (45.61 KiB) Viewed 6435 times
Martin

Dave M
Blackwood
Posts: 595
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 6:44 am
Location: Somerset UK

Re: Shape of Braces - Is conical cross-section the best shape?

Post by Dave M » Wed Feb 08, 2023 10:31 am

That’s interesting Martin.

On a classical the brace height is so small that putting holes in it probably won’t do much.

However the big x brace on a steel string may well be worth thinking about. As I understand it the stiffness of a beam is not reduced by much if you take material out of the centre. (And please correct me if I am wrong) so one may be able to get a significant reduction in mass for not too much loss of stiffness for these big braces.

A proper engineer could set me right on this. Is Trevor perhaps listening in?
------------------
Dave

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10582
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Shape of Braces - Is conical cross-section the best shape?

Post by kiwigeo » Wed Feb 08, 2023 11:16 am

Dave M wrote:
Wed Feb 08, 2023 10:31 am
As I understand it the stiffness of a beam is not reduced by much if you take material out of the centre. (And please correct me if I am wrong) so one may be able to get a significant reduction in mass for not too much loss of stiffness for these big braces.
I believe that is correct but Trevor will be along to the pulpit at some stage to preach the truth :)
Martin

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10582
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Shape of Braces - Is conical cross-section the best shape?

Post by kiwigeo » Wed Feb 08, 2023 11:17 am

That whopping great X brace...surely a tall conventional brace would have far less mass and just as much if not more stiffness?
Martin

TomBeltran
Gidgee
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue May 29, 2018 1:58 am

Re: Shape of Braces - Is conical cross-section the best shape?

Post by TomBeltran » Wed Feb 08, 2023 4:22 pm

On youtube, there is a video called "Guitar Physics and the i-beam bracing," which shows the construction of the I-Brace, using a router. It is at the 16 minute mark. I had heard somewhere that Mossman had changed from the I-Beam brace to holes in the braces to lighten them. A few builders are doing what Kiwigeo shows. Kinscherff guitars does them sort of like that. It might be fun to experiment with, but it seems to me that the I-beam could be the same height as a regular X brace, so it might work better.

User avatar
WJ Guitars
Blackwood
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:28 pm
Location: Sutherland NSW
Contact:

Re: Shape of Braces - Is conical cross-section the best shape?

Post by WJ Guitars » Wed Feb 08, 2023 4:47 pm

Here is another Youtube video to add into the mix of comments regarding guitar 'I' beam braces.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-VeV4n6X-M

As for myself, I will continue using Carbon Fibre top and toe in accordance with the Gore / Gerald books.

Wayne

User avatar
peter.coombe
Blackwood
Posts: 723
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:52 pm
Location: Bega, NSW
Contact:

Re: Shape of Braces - Is conical cross-section the best shape?

Post by peter.coombe » Sun Feb 12, 2023 10:45 am

As described above, you can reduce mass by making braces tall and thin, or drilling holes in them. However, carbon fiber has a very high stiffness to weight ratio, no wood even comes close, so the most effective way to make braces stiffer and lighter is to use carbon fiber tow. It is no coincidence that falcate bracing and lattice bracing using carbon fiber makes lighter tops than any other method. Carbon fiber also gives you stability because it does not have memory like wood does. This is all covered in the Gore/Gilet book. The disadvantage is you need to use epoxy which is messy, smelly, and toxic stuff to work with, but the end result is worth it. Just take precautions, gloves, good ventilation and don't sniff it. I am with Wayne on this.
Peter Coombe - mandolin, mandola and guitar maker
http://www.petercoombe.com

User avatar
Taffy Evans
Blackwood
Posts: 994
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:54 pm
Location: Charters Towers North Queensland

Re: Shape of Braces - Is conical cross-section the best shape?

Post by Taffy Evans » Sun Feb 19, 2023 9:43 am

Hi, over the years I have often added a brace to a top to stabilize a repair on certain guitars. To limit the amount of extra mass introduced to the top I have at times put holes in the brace. Here is a photo of an early repair using this idea.
DSCF5107.JPG
Sorry for photo quality
DSCF5107.JPG (38.05 KiB) Viewed 5929 times
Cheers Taff
Taff

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests