Something doesn't ring right with this whole story, I did some further searching and came upon this blog
http://www.absolute-data-exchange.com/t ... -campbell/ which has a section entitled "Kiri's court appearance" I assume this court appearance was supposed to have taken place in a New Zealand court. There's one section that doesn't read properly....
"Kiri began executing a “NOTICE TO COURTS AND AGENTS” which was a statement written by her. This was a very powerful statement (Posted below). This was a notice she had used in the past which the Court may have been familiar with.
Kiri was told to “stand in silence.”
During the execution of the notice an officer walked up to her and said “shut up!”
Kiri ignored them and continued to execute the notice to completion.
Kiri said “the notice was received and accepted.”
Kiri was then “arrested” again or kidnapped from the Court house.
Kiri was accosted by 2 men and a women reporting to be police officers who never gave their real names.
As a result of reading the notice she was charged with “Breach of the Peace.”
For one thing an "officer" wouldn't have walked up to her and told her to "Shut Up" in a New Zealand court the only "officer" in an NZ civil case court is Prison officers who only escort the defendent and aren't allowed to speak. The judge is the only person who can order silence or ask a defendent to be quiet. Again she could not have been "arrested again or kidnapped from the court house" as prison officers have no powers of arrest, they could be instructed by the judge, to take the defendent back to a cell until they had quitened down but cannot "arrest or Kidnap".
Weird affair, there's too many things that don't add up (just the lack of
any media coverage locally for one!) for me to take this seriously.
