Nut / saddle compensation / tricky verification

You can ask questions here about Trevor and Gerard's exciting new book on Luthiery.

Moderators: kiwigeo, Jeremy D

Post Reply
edvinguitars.fi
Gidgee
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2024 3:45 am
Location: Finland

Nut / saddle compensation / tricky verification

Post by edvinguitars.fi » Mon Apr 22, 2024 2:26 am

I completed a short mini-project and created new saddle-nut compensation for my low action setup by using Greg's excellen spreadsheet.

I encountered a positive problem: the perfomance is probably better than my measurement equipment! namely, I tested 5 different mobile/PC based tools and got quite different results.

For the sake of simplicity, I recorded a short video of Peterson products I have. To my surprise, the E string result varies 0..-14c using these tools. Makes me ask a question how can I validate my setup if the measurement accuracy is so bad?

As a computer / digital design engineer, I assume the processor load/ oscillator variance / windows / Android etc peculiarities may affect the results, and I am thinking the most accurate one is the dedicated portable Peterson tuner. Which, unfortunately, does not show any cent scale differences :-(

What do you use to validate your intonation?

https://youtu.be/ryqI5HT07CI

Jani

Dave M
Blackwood
Posts: 599
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 6:44 am
Location: Somerset UK

Re: Nut / saddle compensation / tricky verification

Post by Dave M » Tue Apr 23, 2024 2:16 am

I use AP Tuner running on Windows. I like it for the large display and it does give you cents. It does do some other clever stuff which I don't use.

I don't think I have seen the variation that you refer to except when fretting notes where all sorts of havoc breaks loose.
------------------
Dave

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10613
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Nut / saddle compensation / tricky verification

Post by kiwigeo » Tue Apr 23, 2024 10:06 am

+1 for AP Tuner
Martin

User avatar
lamanoditrento
Blackwood
Posts: 598
Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 9:50 am

Re: Nut / saddle compensation / tricky verification

Post by lamanoditrento » Fri May 24, 2024 3:15 am

I have have a folder of apps I've downloaded over the years and spent a bit of time comparing them to a bunch of tuners I have. Of the tuners hanging around, I looked a polytune pedal, an over priced peterson clip-on that claimed 0.1 cent accuracy, a korg with 1/4" aux or wired clip-on and a d'addario soundhole one. By far the polytune and korg aux'd were the most accurate and consistent with each other, followed by the d'addario soundhole tuner. The korg clip-on got better if I clipped the sound hole rather than the headstock, which may explain the d'addaro.

The best of the app was Cleartune which was consistent with the aux'd tuners and is easy to read the cents especially in landscape. Although AP Tuner was close. I also dislike the strobe a bit as I find it harder to ignore/truncate the attack and decay when Im watch it (but that may be a me problem rather than the app's).
Screenshot 2024-05-24 at 3.10.28 AM.png
Screenshot 2024-05-24 at 3.10.28 AM.png (196.26 KiB) Viewed 99 times
https://apps.apple.com/au/app/cleartune/id286799607
Trent

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Rsquared and 5 guests